Telecommunications Cybersecurity Services in Canada
Secure telecommunications infrastructure, protect network operations, customer communications, and subscriber data from targeted cyber threats.
Key Statistic
90%
Of telecom companies report increased cyber attacks in the past year
Source: Industry security research
What Telecommunications organizations face
Attackers target telecommunications because of the combination of sensitive data, compliance obligations, and operational complexity. These are the gaps we close.
Network Security
Enhance the security of your network infrastructure against sophisticated cyber threats and attacks.
Service Continuity
Implement resilient strategies to maintain service continuity even under cyber assault.
Data Privacy Compliance
Ensure compliance with international data privacy laws and protect sensitive customer information.
Of telecom companies report increased cyber attacks in the past year
90%
Average cost of a data breach in the telecom sector
$9.5M
Of telecom industries are investing more in cybersecurity
70%
Built for how telecommunications works
Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
Primary24/7 monitoring and rapid response to cyber threats, keeping your business safe around the clock.
What Telecommunications clients gain
Enhanced Security
Protect your telecommunications network and customer data from cyber threats.
Regulatory Compliance
Ensure compliance with industry regulations and data privacy laws.
Service Continuity
Minimize downtime and maintain operations with our comprehensive incident response support.
Why Quantm for Telecommunications
Expertise
Our team specializes in telecommunications cybersecurity, understanding the unique challenges of securing network infrastructure and customer data.
Compliance
We ensure compliance with telecommunications industry regulations and security standards while maintaining operational efficiency.
Scalability
Our solutions scale with your network operations, providing consistent security across multiple platforms and systems.
Cyber threats specific to Canadian telecommunications companies
SIM swapping is among the highest-impact attack methods targeting Canadian telecom customers, and the telecom company's customer service infrastructure is the point of compromise. An attacker who convinces a carrier's customer service representative to transfer a target's phone number to a SIM card the attacker controls gains the ability to intercept SMS-based one-time passwords, reset banking and email passwords, and drain accounts before the victim is aware anything has happened. Canadian victims have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in cryptocurrency and banking funds through SIM swap attacks. The weakness is not primarily technical — it is procedural: social engineering scripts exploit inconsistent identity verification practices, gaps between in-store and phone channel authentication requirements, and customer service representatives who prioritize customer satisfaction over security friction. Carriers have implemented number transfer protection features, but these are often opt-in rather than default.
SS7 (Signalling System No. 7) protocol vulnerabilities affect all carriers that participate in the global telephone network, including Canadian carriers. SS7 was designed in the 1970s with an implicit trust model that assumes all network nodes are operated by legitimate carriers — a trust model that no longer reflects reality. Attackers with access to an SS7 node (which can be obtained by registering a carrier in a permissive jurisdiction or by compromising a legitimate carrier's infrastructure) can redirect calls and SMS messages, track subscriber location in real time, and intercept communications without the target's knowledge. The CRTC's DNS security requirements and broader network security obligations for carriers reflect a regulatory environment that is increasingly attentive to core network vulnerabilities, though SS7 remediation requires international coordination beyond any single regulator's authority.
VoIP fraud, specifically International Revenue Share Fraud (IRSF), costs the global telecommunications industry billions of dollars annually and Canadian VoIP providers are not immune. IRSF works by compromising a business's PBX system or SIP trunk credentials, then using them to generate large volumes of calls to premium-rate numbers in foreign jurisdictions where the fraudster collects a share of the termination revenue. A single weekend of fraudulent traffic can generate charges of tens of thousands of dollars on a business's account. Canadian VoIP providers face both the direct cost of fraud where they absorb losses and the reputational cost of customer disputes. Toll fraud detection — anomaly monitoring on call destinations, volumes, and timing — is not optional for any VoIP provider operating in Canada, and the CRTC's robocall and STIR/SHAKEN requirements create additional compliance obligations for carriers managing voice traffic authentication.
Lawful intercept infrastructure represents a uniquely sensitive attack surface for telecommunications companies. Canadian carriers are required under the Telecommunications Act to maintain the technical capability to assist law enforcement with court-authorized interception of communications. This infrastructure is a high-value target for foreign intelligence services precisely because it provides a mechanism to access communications at the network level. The compromise of lawful intercept infrastructure at a major carrier provides access to court-ordered interceptions in progress, law enforcement investigation targets, and the metadata of surveillance activity itself. Customer care teams are also a persistent phishing and social engineering target: a successful compromise of a customer service account can enable account takeover on behalf of a customer without any technical network access required.
Regulatory cybersecurity obligations for Canadian telecom providers
CRTC Telecom Decision 2022-212 established DNS security requirements for Canadian ISPs, mandating implementation of DNS-based blocking for known malicious domains as part of a national DNS security framework. The decision requires participating ISPs to block domains identified by the CCCS as malicious infrastructure, creating an operational obligation to maintain and update blocking lists and to implement the technical mechanisms to enforce them. For smaller ISPs and regional carriers that have not previously invested in DNS security infrastructure, this decision represents a meaningful compliance cost. The CRTC has signalled that it views DNS security as one component of a broader set of network security obligations, and subsequent decisions are expected to address additional security requirements for licensed carriers.
The Telecommunications and Cybersecurity Act (TCSA) — more formally, the amendments to the Telecommunications Act enacted under Bill C-26 — created a new framework under which the federal government can direct telecommunications service providers to take specific security measures or prohibit the use of specific equipment or services from designated suppliers. The TCSA was the legislative mechanism used to formalize the exclusion of Huawei equipment from Canadian 5G networks following the government's security review. Beyond specific supplier exclusions, the TCSA gives the Governor in Council and the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry broad powers to issue security directives to telecom providers, including requirements to implement specific security controls, conduct security audits, or report security incidents. Non-compliance with a TCSA security directive is an offence under the Telecommunications Act.
PIPEDA subscriber data obligations for Canadian carriers are significant given the volume and sensitivity of the personal information carriers hold. A carrier's subscriber records include home address, billing information, device identifiers, call detail records (CDRs), and — for mobile carriers — location data derived from network activity. The OPC has consistently treated location data as among the most sensitive categories of personal information, and CDRs can reveal detailed patterns about an individual's daily movements, relationships, and activities. A breach of carrier subscriber data triggers mandatory breach reporting to the OPC under PIPEDA's breach of security safeguards provisions if there is a real risk of significant harm. For a carrier with millions of subscribers, a breach affecting a large population creates both regulatory and class action litigation exposure. Canadian courts have certified class actions following telecom data breaches.
Lawful access requirements impose a security obligation distinct from subscriber privacy: the carrier must protect the integrity and confidentiality of the interception infrastructure itself, and must ensure that lawful intercept requests are fulfilled only for validly authorized court orders. Unauthorized access to lawful intercept capabilities — whether by an attacker who has compromised the carrier's network or by an insider — constitutes both a serious security failure and a potential criminal offence. The procedural and technical controls around lawful access systems must meet a higher standard than general IT security controls, and carriers are expected to maintain audit logs, access controls, and separation of duties for systems handling court-authorized interceptions. The CRTC's authority to inspect carrier compliance with lawful access obligations means that deficiencies in this area carry direct regulatory consequences.
Common questions, answered.
Questions we hear most often about telecommunications security, compliance, operations, and response planning.
Ask us anything