Cybersecurity Solutions for Canadian Mining Industry
Secure mining operations with cybersecurity for operational technology, control systems, remote sites, and critical infrastructure.
Key Statistic
59%
Of mining companies have experienced at least one significant cyber incident
Source: Industry security research
What Mining organizations face
Attackers target mining organizations for their data, essential systems, and complex operations. These are the gaps we help close.
Operational Technology Security
Secure operational technology and industrial control systems against cyber threats
Data Integrity and Access
Protect sensitive geological data and proprietary mining technology
Supply Chain Security
Enhance security measures along the supply chain
Of mining companies have experienced at least one significant cyber incident
59%
Average cost of cybersecurity breaches in the mining sector
$4.9M
Increase in targeted cyber attacks on the mining industry
67%
What Mining clients gain
Enhanced Safety
Improved safety through better security controls
Operational Efficiency
Streamlined operations with secure systems
Risk Mitigation
Reduced cyber risks and potential threats
Why Quantm for Mining
Expertise
Our team specializes in mining industry cybersecurity, understanding the unique challenges of securing both IT and OT environments.
Compliance
We ensure compliance with mining industry regulations and security standards while maintaining operational efficiency.
Scalability
Our solutions scale with your operations, providing consistent security across multiple sites and systems.
Cyber threats facing Canadian mining and resource extraction companies
- The financial impact of a production stoppage at a large Canadian mining operation makes ransomware an extremely high-leverage attack.
- A mid-tier gold producer operating at 500,000 ounces per year loses roughly $1.4 million in production value per day at current gold prices if the operation halts.
- An oil sands operation running at 200,000 barrels per day loses about $15 million in daily gross revenue at $75 per barrel.
- Ransomware groups have explicitly targeted industrial operators for this reason, the cost of paying the ransom is often a fraction of the cost of extended downtime, creating a rational economic basis for payment that threat actors understand.
- The CCCS 2023 National Cyber Threat Assessment specifically identified critical infrastructure including energy and mining as priority targets for ransomware actors seeking high ransom payments.
- Commodity trading data and market-sensitive information are high-value targets for financially motivated attackers and foreign state actors.
- A mining company's production forecasts, reserve estimates, hedging positions, and acquisition pipeline are material non-public information under Canadian securities law.
- An attacker who extracts this data before a public announcement can profit through securities trading or sell the information to competitors or foreign state-owned enterprises.
- Canadian mining companies with significant offshore operations or joint ventures with foreign partners in jurisdictions of concern are specifically at risk from state-sponsored economic espionage.
- CSE has assessed in its Cyber Threat Bulletins that state actors target Canadian resource extraction companies to gain economic intelligence and competitive advantage for state-owned enterprises in the same sectors.
- Operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems at mine sites present a fundamentally different attack surface from corporate IT networks.
- Conveyor belt controls, ventilation systems, haul truck automation, ore processing SCADA, and environmental monitoring systems are often running on legacy operating systems, Windows XP and Windows 7 remain common in mine control rooms, and were designed for reliability and availability rather than security.
- These systems are increasingly connected to corporate IT networks for remote monitoring and optimization, creating a pathway from a phishing email in the corporate office to a manipulation of process control systems at a mine site thousands of kilometres away.
- The CCCS has issued advisories specifically warning that OT environments in Canadian critical infrastructure sectors lack the network segmentation, monitoring, and patch management practices needed to withstand targeted attacks.
- Remote site connectivity creates unique attack surface in Canadian mining.
- Operations in northern Ontario, the oil sands, British Columbia's interior, and northern Quebec connect to corporate networks via satellite, microwave links, or leased WAN circuits.
- These links are often the only connectivity available, making them single points of failure, and their management is often outsourced to telecommunications contractors whose own security posture is unverified.
- Supply chain attacks targeting mining-specific software, fleet management platforms like Modular Mining, ore tracking systems, safety management applications, and time-and-attendance systems used at remote sites, allow attackers to reach mine operators through trusted software update channels rather than direct network compromise.
- The 3CX supply chain attack in 2023 shown that even software with valid digital signatures can be compromised by a sophisticated threat actor.
Cybersecurity and data obligations for Canadian mining companies
- Mining carries four compliance obligations most companies don't connect to cybersecurity: securities disclosure for TSX-listed operators, PIPEDA across large remote-site contractor workforces, environmental reporting integrity, and Indigenous partnership data under Impact Benefit Agreements.
- A falsified environmental monitoring reading, for instance, exposes the company to the same liability whether it was manipulated by an attacker or a disgruntled contractor.
Four obligations beyond standard IT security
| Obligation | Applies to | What it requires |
|---|---|---|
| Securities disclosure (OSC NI 51-102, CSA SN 11-332) | TSX-listed mining companies | Material cyber incidents (e.g. production-halting ransomware) require disclosure within 10 business days |
| PIPEDA | Contractor workforces, FIFO biometric access, remote medical clinics | Security safeguards proportionate to sensitivity, regardless of how remote the site is |
| Environmental reporting (CEPA, Fisheries Act) | Water quality, air emissions, tailings pond monitoring data | Data integrity obligations; falsification risks fines up to $6M/day under the Fisheries Act |
| Impact Benefit Agreements (IBAs) | Indigenous partnership and community data | Contractual security measures separate from PIPEDA and securities law, often missed by compliance teams |
Common questions, answered.
Questions we hear most often about mining security, compliance, operations, and response planning.
Ask us anything